The Time Traveler's Wife is a great title but it is also not quite right. It would be more correctly be entitled, "The Time Traveler and his Wife" because this story is told fairly equally from the points of view of both Henry (Eric Bana) and Clare (Rachel McAdams). Henry has a genetic mutation that causes him to travel, not quite randomly, through time. It is the first novel written by Audrey Niffenegger. And I have to say that the book totally blew me away. I love time travel stories, and the way Niffenegger weaves the stories of Henry and Clare together back and forth through time is amazing. Clare meets Henry for the first time when she is a little girl and he is in his thirties and traveling back in time.
Then when she meets him as a young women in real time, he doesn't know who she is. On their wedding day, Henry disappears to another time and place, but luckily another older version of himself shows up to take part in the ceremony. These are just examples of the fascinating non-linear progression of the relationships in this book. Henry even hangs out with different aged versions of himself quite a bit. The movie contains most of the main plot but the many layers of time traveling gets mostly lost so that the movie can be a reasonable length. Henry's first girlfriend, whose suicide haunts him throughout the book, is completely excised, and Gomez (Ron Livingstone), Henry's best friend and Clare's lover from afar, becomes a very minor character in the film. The Time Traveler's Wife doesn't have too many changes to the plot, but they do make it so Clare doesn't have to wait so long to "see" Henry at the end of the story. The book is very intense, first with the love affair that seems pre-ordained, and then by the increasing desperation of both Clare and Henry as they hurtle towards an end that they can see coming only too well. The movie well cast. I like both Bana (Star Trek, Munich) and McAdams (Sherlock Holmes, Wedding Crashers) but it is very bland, with none of the intensity of the book. And the special effects of the time travel are a bit hokey.
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is a totally different kind of story from The Time Traveler's Wife but this murder mystery also has many layers of subplots. The movie version (in Swedish with subtitles) makes many changes to the plot of the book to streamline and simplify the story. And they also make a huge change from the book at the end of the film. In the film, the story concentrates on two people, Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace), the "girl" of the title, and Mikael Blomqvist, a well-known journalist. The subplot that leads to the two characters crossing paths, has been cut from the movie so it doesn't flow as well. The main plot of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo concerns the disappearance of a 16 year old girl 40 years before the action of the movie begins. Blomqvist is hired to try and solve the mystery of her disappearance and Salander joins him in the search which leads far beyond the original mystery.
I don't see many Swedish films (Ingemar Bergman is no longer on the scene) but this film has a almost 50's feel, particularly in the music. And it was done in a very melodramatic style. I liked the casting of Blomqvist but I wasn't completely happy with Salander. But maybe no one can fill this role to match my imagination. It is interesting that even though The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is in theatres now, David Fincher (Se7en, Fight Club) has already announced that he is directing a Hollywood version. It is definitely his type of movie with a dark plot and dark characters. I look forward to his version. Apparently, he is trying to choose between Kristen Stewart (Twilight) and Carey Mulligan (An Education) for the lead role of Lisbeth Salander. Mulligan might be good but Stewart was born to play this role.
No comments:
Post a Comment