Friday, April 23, 2010

Eowyn in Wonderland

The new film version of Alice in Wonderland, directed by Tim Burton, starts out very like Alice in Wonderland, but after she chases a white rabbit, falls down a rabbit hole and drinks something labeled, "drink me," and eats something labeled, "eat me," not so much. As time goes on, the film is less like Alice in Wonderland and more like a film with a bunch of characters named Alice, Red Queen, White Queen etc etc in a very derivative sequel that reminds one of Lord of the Rings and The Golden Compass. Oh yes, there is a Mad Hatter (Johnny Depp), a Cheshire Cat (Stephen Fry's voice), a caterpillar (Alan Rickman's voice), a Red Queen (Helena Bonham Carter, well mostly her head), a White Queen (Anne Hathaway), and an Alice (Mia Wasikowska), of course. 
And it all looks very Wonderland (in 3D!) but I guess the original story wasn't, hmmm, derivative enough. So Tim Burton thought to himself, let's have a dragon (Jabberwock) and a famous sword wielded by a young woman in armor (Lord of the Rings) and have her ride around on a Bandersnatch that looks a lot like a polar bear (The Golden Compass). And since Johnny Depp is playing the Mad Hatter, he can't be a minor character who isn't in the story much, so now he's the main character. Maybe Tim could have called the movie, "The Mad Hatter in Wonderland."


To be fair, even though the Jabberwock and the Bandersnatch are not characters in the Alice books, they were contained in a famous poem that appeared in Through the Looking Glass,
 "Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
  The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
  The frumious Bandersnatch!"
And, of course, it was never meant to be Alice fighting the Jabberwock. But the scene actually works quite well in the movie. I think that all these extraneous action scenes were added for the 3D because most of Alice in Wonderland works just fine in 2D. 

There are three kinds of characters in Alice in Wonderland, those who are completely or mostly a real actor (Depp, Wasikowska, Hathaway), those who have their head attached to a CGI body (Bonham Carter, Tweedledee and Tweedledum), and those that are completely CGI. Some of the characters are really great, especially the CGI characters like the Cheshire Cat and the Caterpillar. Depp is always good but his Mad Hatter is a bit too Willy Wonka. Bonham Carter as the Red Queen is less than one dimensional, yelling her iconic, "off with their heads" over and over and over. I thought Wasikowska was very good as Alice. She is only 20 and I haven't seen her before except a bit of In Treatment. She was also in Amelia, and Defiance but I still haven't seen them. 


Tim Burton, what can I say? He's great. I'm not sure what he was thinking with this movie. With Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, he put his imprint on it, but stuck mainly to the story. His version of Alice in Wonderland brings First Knight to mind. This was a film with Sean Connery, Richard Gere and Julia Ormond playing characters called King Arthur, Sir Lancelot and Guinevere, which was almost but not entirely unlike the story of King Arthur. All this being said, Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland is a very entertaining movie. And the scene with Alice as Eowyn was definitely a nice "girl power" moment. So what the hell, go see it. You'll probably like it better if you've never read the books. But who cares. As the poem says, Twas brillig, and the slithy toves, Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe.


 

Saturday, April 17, 2010

A Girl and a Wife

I've read a couple of great books lately, The Time Traveler's Wife, and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. And it just so happens that I also saw the movies based on these books within weeks of reading them. It's often hard for me to like films based on books that I've read. I much prefer movies based on books that I haven't read! But I was interested to see how these two excellent books were adapted into movies. Both movies are OK, but neither holds a candle to the original book. In both cases, much of complexity in the story is lost because of the constraints of fitting into a 2 hour movie format. When adapting books for the screen, two things usually happen. First, films tend to concentrate on the main storyline of the book and delete subplots that are deemed not to be central to the plot. Second, the director and the screenwriter adapting the book usually cannot resist making big changes even to the main storyline. In the case of The Time Traveler's Wife, and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, the first thing to go was the romantic subplots. And both films change the endings as well.

The Time Traveler's Wife is a great title but it is also not quite right. It would be more correctly be entitled, "The Time Traveler and his Wife" because this story is told fairly equally from the points of view of both Henry (Eric Bana) and Clare (Rachel McAdams). Henry has a genetic mutation that causes him to travel, not quite randomly, through time. It is the first novel written by Audrey Niffenegger. And I have to say that the book totally blew me away.  I love time travel stories, and the way Niffenegger weaves the stories of Henry and Clare together back and forth through time is amazing. Clare meets Henry for the first time when she is a little girl and he is in his thirties and traveling back in time.
Then when she meets him as a young women in real time, he doesn't know who she is. On their wedding day, Henry disappears to another time and place, but luckily another older version of himself shows up to take part in the ceremony. These are just examples of the fascinating non-linear progression of the relationships in this book.  Henry even hangs out with different aged versions of himself quite a bit. The movie contains most of the main plot but the many layers of time traveling gets mostly lost so that the movie can be a reasonable length. Henry's first girlfriend, whose suicide haunts him throughout the book, is completely excised, and Gomez (Ron Livingstone), Henry's best friend and Clare's lover from afar, becomes a very minor character in the film. The Time Traveler's Wife doesn't have too many changes to the plot, but they do make it so Clare doesn't have to wait so long to "see" Henry at the end of the story. The book is very intense, first with the love affair that seems pre-ordained, and then by the increasing desperation of both Clare and Henry as they hurtle towards an end that they can see coming only too well. The movie well cast. I like both Bana (Star Trek, Munich) and McAdams (Sherlock Holmes, Wedding Crashers) but it is very bland, with none of the intensity of the book. And the special effects of the time travel are a bit hokey.

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is a totally different kind of story from The Time Traveler's Wife but this murder mystery also has many layers of subplots. The movie version (in Swedish with subtitles) makes many changes to the plot of the book to streamline and simplify the story. And they also make a huge change from the book at the end of the film. In the film, the story concentrates on two people, Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace), the "girl" of the title, and Mikael Blomqvist, a well-known journalist. The subplot that leads to the two characters crossing paths, has been cut from the movie so it doesn't flow as well. The main plot of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo concerns the disappearance of a 16 year old girl 40 years before the action of the movie begins. Blomqvist is hired to try and solve the mystery of her disappearance and Salander joins him in the search which leads far beyond the original mystery.
I don't see many Swedish films (Ingemar Bergman is no longer on the scene) but this film has a almost 50's feel, particularly in the music. And it was done in a very melodramatic style. I liked the casting of Blomqvist but I wasn't completely happy with Salander. But maybe no one can fill this role to match my imagination. It is interesting that even though The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is in theatres now, David Fincher (Se7en, Fight Club) has already announced that he is directing a Hollywood version. It is definitely his type of movie with a dark plot and dark characters. I look forward to his version. Apparently, he is trying to choose between Kristen Stewart (Twilight) and Carey Mulligan (An Education) for the lead role of Lisbeth Salander. Mulligan might be good but Stewart was born to play this role.

 



Friday, March 5, 2010

Geoff's Top Ten Movies of 2009

The Oscars are coming up on Sunday evening, and the ten (that's right ten!) films nominated for Best Picture are in alphabetical order:
  • Avatar
  • The Blind Side
  • District 9
  • An Education
  • The Hurt Locker
  • Inglourious Basterds
  • Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire
  • A Serious Man
  • Up
  • Up in the Air
 My list isn't completely different. Five of the films nominated for Oscars are also on my Top Ten List below. I have seen all ten Oscar movies and they are all good, well, I had a few issues with Inglorious Basterds. I resisted seeing Precious and The Blind Side as long as I could but I went to see them because I knew they would get Oscar nominations. And they were both good, but they didn't make my list. Avatar should get a special Oscar for visual effects, but it certainly isn't the Best Picture of 2009. It doesn't even make my Top Ten. Up was OK, but I didn't think it measured "up" to previous Pixar films.

 Here is my Top Ten List for 2009:

1. The Hurt Locker
    My number one film of the year, which may in fact win the Oscar, is The Hurt Locker. Unfortunately, very few people have seen this movie. I think it is suffering because it is an Iraq War film, and apparently no one wants to see a movie about Iraq. But you have to see this movie. Director Katherine Bigelow has made a perfect edge-of-your-seat thriller about a bomb disposal team in Baghdad. This is an intense movie from beginning to end, and it just keeps ratcheting up the tension. The cast is mostly unknowns ( afew recognizable faces appear only to get blown up), but the lead, Jeremy Renner and the supporting cast are great. He is nominated for an Oscar for Best Actor. It's almost out of the theatres but go see it if you can. Otherwise, put it on top of your Netflix list.

    2. Up in the Air
    I really loved this movie. I will be just as happy if Up in the Air wins Best Picture as I would be if Hurt Locker wins. I know there are people (like me) who love George Clooney, and people who don't, but this is his perfect film. He is nominated for an Oscar, and so are his supporting cast members, Vera Farmiga and Anna Kendrick. In Up in the Air, Clooney's character lives in airports as he travels the country firing people, and trying to avoid any personal relationships. But eventually he has to put something in the backpack. This movie was directed by Jason Reitman, who also directed Juno. He really knows how to make a good movie. Up in the Air is great all the way through to the the very non-Hollywood ending. For more, look at my review of Up in the Air....

    3. Star Trek
    I was looking forward to the rebirth of Star Trek but at the same time, I was  dreading what they might do it. But my fears were unfounded. The new Star Trek is a great movie, both for people like me who saw the original "classic" Star Trek live, and for people who actually don't know James T. Kirk's middle name. The director, J. J. Abrams managed to hit the multiverse button for a fresh restart without losing the essence of Star Trek. The new cast, playing the same old characters, do it very well. My personal favorite is Simon Pegg's joyful portrayal of Scotty. It was also great to see Leonard Nimoy. But poor Winona Ryder. Was that her comeback?



    4. District 9
    District 9 came out of nowhere with huge buzz and it did not disappoint. It's nice to be able to put two SciFi films in my Top Ten in one year! This South African movie does a wonderful job of being great SciFi, as well as making a nice political statement. There are echoes of movies like The Fly, Robocop and Enemy Mine, but District 9 explores the time-honored plotline of a thoughtless all powerful person, who is suddenly forced to walk in the shoes of someone he has oppressed and looked down on. Director, Neill Blomkamp and lead actor Sharlto Copley have re-made Apartheid in a way that no one can forget. And there is clearly going to be a sequel. I can't wait.



    5. The Messenger
    The Messenger is the other Iraq film in my Top Ten. I saw both The Messenger and The Hurt Locker at the Nantucket Film Festival. This one is set mostly in the States, following two officers (Ben Foster and Woody Harrelson) as they inform people that their loved ones have been killed. This is a small movie of short vignettes full of horrible emotion. The one exception is one young widow (Samantha Morton), who Foster's character befriends and then falls in love with. Both Foster and Harrelson are dealing with their own ghosts as they try and do their jobs which wear them down a little more each day. Woody Harrelson is nominated for an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor.



    6. An Education
    An Education is a wonderful film about a teenage girl growing up in 1960's England. This could have been a very creepy movie given its Lolita-esque plotline, but it is saved from that by a wonderful cast led by the effervescent Carey Mulligan who plays the girl who wants to get out and experience life now, and Peter Sarsgaard, who plays the much older, charming but very smarmy con artist who promises her just that. Alfred Molina, Emma Thompson and Olivia Williams round out the great supporting cast. Mulligan gets a well deserved nomination for Best Actress for this role. For more, look at my review of An Education....



    7. Crazy Heart
    I really love Jeff Bridges, and he has more than earned his reputation as the most under-appreciated actor in Hollywood. Until this year, he had never won an Oscar or a Golden Globe despite doing movies like Tron, Starman, The Fabulous Baker Boys and The Big Lebowski. Bridges has been nominated for an Oscar four times previously, but this may be his year. He already won the Golden Globe for his role in Crazy Heart as a washed-up, alcoholic country singer, who decides his life isn't really over after meeting and falling for a young reporter (Maggie Gyllenhaal). Besides the great performances, the thing that makes this such a great movie is the music, composed by T-Bone Burnett, and performed by Bridges, himself. For more, look at my review of Crazy Heart....

    8. Nine
    Nine is yet another Broadway musical adapted to the screen. It didn't get much in the way of good reviews and it didn't last long in the theatres. But I really loved it. With a cast featuring Daniel Day-Lewis, Marion Cotillard, Penelope Cruz, Nicole Kidman, Judi Dench, Kate Hudson, Fergie, a pair of sunglasses,  and a beautiful little blue sportscar, I ask, what's not to like? The music is great and Daniel Day-Lewis can read from the phonebook as far as I'm concerned. Everyone in the cast, even Judi Dench, has a great boffo musical number. Like I said, I was blown away. For more, look at my review of Nine....




    9. A Serious Man
    What can I say about the Coen brothers? They are amazing. They make strange, compelling, sometimes repelling, films that are from another dimension. I don't like all their films but I really want them to keep making them. Last year they won Best Picture for No Country for Old Men about a serial killer with a bad haircut. A Serious Man couldn't be more different, and at first it doesn't really seem to be about anything. It just follows the day-to-day minutiae of the life of a Physics professor. But bit by bit, we see how every aspect of his life is beginning to fall apart, apparently because of bad karma. I found that this film just sucked me in and wouldn't let me go, which I assume is just what the Coen brothers had planned all along. For more, look at my review of A Serious Man....

    10. The Road
    The Road is a very good adaptation of yet another Cormac McCarthy novel (he wrote No Country for Old Men too). Maybe the subject matter was just too depressing when the real world seems to be falling apart around us but The Road sank without a trace. It is nominated for exactly zero Oscars. But you should see it. It is really good, and, yes, depressing. But Viggo Mortenson as the father and Kodi Smit-McPhee as the son with a few flashbacks of Charlize Theron as the mother make for a very atmospheric and beautiful film. For more, look at my review of The Road....






    Some other movies I really liked last year: Julie & Julia, A Single Man, Public Enemies, Bright Star, Precious, 500 Days of Summer.


    Sunday, January 31, 2010

    Still Crazy After All These Years

    When Jeff Bridges got up at the Golden Globes to accept the award for Best Actor in a Drama for his role in Crazy Heart, he may have started to shed his reputation as the most underappreciated actor in Hollywood. It was his first win at the Golden Globes after three previous nominations. He has also been nominated four times for an Oscar (The Last Picture Show, Thunderbolt and Lightfoot, Starman, and The Contender) without winning. He wasn't even nominated for some of his great signature roles like Tron, The Fabulous Baker Boys and The Big Lebowski. In Crazy Heart, Jeff Bridges plays a down and out country singer, Bad Blake. He is down on his luck, to say the least, and is driving from town to town playing at bars and drinking. In one small town, he is interviewed by a local reporter (Maggie Gyllenhaal), who is divorced with a small son. A rocky romance ensues. Meanwhile, Bridges tries to get his life together with help from his best friend (Robert Duvall) and a younger performer (Colin Farrell) that he helped on the way up.

    On paper, this plot of this movie is a hackneyed stereotype of the hard-drinking, hard-living country singer with has lots of talent but has become an old-broken down alcoholic who is performing at bowling alleys. But Crazy Heart rises above the stereotype, thanks to Jeff Bridges, the rest of the wonderful supporting cast, and some great music composed by T-Bone Burnett. Bridges performs the songs himself. The director of  Crazy Heart is Scott Cooper, yet another first time director. This film certainly has the feel of an indie movie despite the A-list cast.

    I love, love, love Jeff Bridges. He is one of my favorite actors. He really inhabits a role and gives it a life with energy. His characters are always struggling with setbacks in life and are tinged with some sadness, whether it is an alien in a human body in Starman, The Dude in The Big Lebowski, or one half of a brother pianist act in The Fabulous Baker Boys. In Crazy Heart, he has found another such role and he handles it perfectly. 
    Crazy Heart is a tale of redemption, but also of realism. His character is struggling to get his life back together, and he makes some progress, but by the end of the movie the jury is still out on whether he will succeed. Crazy Heart involves a May-September romance like so many of movies do. But Bridges' relationship with Maggie Gyllenhaal seems very real, and it founders on the rocks as it must. Robert Duvall is good as always as Bridges' down-home best buddie, in a role almost as small as he had in The Road. And Colin Farrell does a nice almost cameo as Bridges' protege who has gone on to stardom but still remembers his roots. Farrell is Irish, but he fits into the British tradition of big stars doing character roles and doing them very well.

    Crazy Heart is the story of a musician and it never would have been believable if it didn't have his music. So, T-Bone Burnett composed a whole bunch of songs that become the 30-year repertoire of an Bad Blake. And it all works because Bridges can play the guitar and sing the songs. I'm not a country fan but the soundtrack is great. And so is Bridges' performance which may win him his first Oscar. This movie is still in the theatres. You should see it if you can.

      

    Saturday, January 30, 2010

    It's an Education

    The plot of An Education sounds like it is just a remake of Lolita but it is actually based on the true story of a high school girl (Carey Mulligan) growing up in England  in the 1960's who is seduced by a con artist (Peter Sarsgaard) in his early thirties who is passing himself off as an art dealer. He and another couple (Dominic Cooper & Rosamund Pike) live high off the hog while leading a life of crime. Sarsgaard meets Mulligan by chance and is soon seducing not just her, but her parents (Alfred Molina & Cara Seymour) as well. The naiveté of the family is such that Mulligan's father, who originally doesn't even want her to date another high school boy for fear of hurting her chances of getting into university, urges her to go away for a weekend with Saarsgard. Mulligan is in cahoots with him because she has fallen for  him hard and she is scamming her parents without realizing that Saarsgard is doing the same to her.

    Mulligan, who was Kitty in the Keira Knightly Pride and Prejudice is perfect as the 16 year old (she is actually 24) who wants her life to begin now. An Education is her movie and she carries it off very nicely. Peter Sarsgaard (Rendition) is always very good and he is very believable as the smarmy con artist. I really like Dominic Cooper (The History Boys)  who plays Saarsgard's sidekick with panache and Rosamund Pike who was Jane in the Keira Knightly Pride and Prejudice is good as his blonde bimbo girlfriend. Alfred Molina who plays the father gets to speak in something like his real accent here. In most of his movies (Frida, Spider-Man 2, The Da Vinci Code), he is not even British. He is a classic British character actor and is fantastic at whatever role he plays. Emma Thompson also shows that all British actors are character actors at their core. She does a nice turn in An Education as the dowdy, hard, bitter, principal at Mulligan's school who considers her to be damaged goods. Olivia Williams (Rushmore, The Sixth Sense) has a nice but small part as the teacher who turns out to be the opposite of Thompson.


    The direction and the art direction in An Education are really fab. The setting of the film in 1960's middle class England looks perfect. The story moves right along and An Education feels like it has a lot of action for a film that is mostly just people talking. The thing that makes this story more interesting than just Lolita is the involvement of Mulligan's parents in the seduction and how they are totally taken in by. There are still some very Lolita-esque parts of An Education so it does have its creepy aspects. The film is just very well done with a bunch of great British actors so it is a joy to watch them in action. And Mulligan shows that she belongs with the likes Thompson and Molina.

    Monday, January 25, 2010

    Not so Fantastic Mr. Fox


    Fantastic Mr. Fox is the new film from quirky director Wes Anderson, whose previous films include Rushmore, The Royal Tenenbaums, The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, and The Darjeeling Limited. Anderson's films are comedies that specialize in awkward, unsocialized characters who are trying to fit into the real world. This may explain why Anderson's muse is Bill Murray who has appeared in all of Anderson's movies in greater or lesser roles. In fact, I credit Wes Anderson with saving Bill Murray's career which has had a resurgence since he appeared in Rushmore, including an Oscar nomination for Lost in Translation. Like Woody Allen and the Coen Brothers, Wes Anderson's movies are hit or miss, but you want him to keep making movies.  Rushmore is a big favorite of mine, and as a fan of Jacques Cousteau as a kid, I really appreciated The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou.

    In his new film, Wes Anderson has moved into animation; not just animation but stop-action animation. This is a little used technique these days outside of the classic Wallace and Gromit movies. The making of Fantastic Mr. Fox involved puppets and tiny sets, with each puppet painstakingly moved a tiny fraction and then filmed and so on over and over until you get a movie. One of the charms of Fantastic Mr. Fox is that the animation really doesn't look that good. This movie has a Wallace and Gromit feel to it. The makers of  Wallace and Gromit  concoct a complex plot about something very silly, usually involving cheese and sheep, and Wes Anderson has done something very similar involving foxes, chickens and cider. The film is based on a book by Roald Dahl. In the story, Fantastic Mr. Fox (George Clooney) decides to settle down and raise a family. He marries Mrs. Fox (Meryl Streep). But he can't quite settle down and he is always wanting to raid the chicken coops of the nearby nasty farmers, Boggis, Bunce and Bean. The Foxes have a son (Jason Schwartzman) who is a chip off the old block and before long he and another young fox (Wallace Wolodarsky) are planning raids of their own.


    For a slight, silly film, Fantastic Mr. Fox has a fairly complex plot and a lot of characters. Besides the fox family, there are various other animals who are friends and associates of Mr. Fox, including Badger (Bill Murray). There are three evil bad guys plus their minions including a rat (Willem Dafoe). But it is all very light-hearted, especially Mr. Fox himself who blithely goes forward with his plans even as the roof is literally falling in. My favorite silly things in the movie are the whistle and clicks that Mr. Fox always gives as a greeting and the "bandit hats" that they wear as a badge of courage during their raids. I quite liked parts of Fantastic Mr. Fox but it didn't really hold my interest.  I took a few naps during the movie so I may have missed the best bits. My napping is not a good method of rating a movie since I slept through quite a bit of The Big Lebowski the first time I saw it. Anyway, I have to say that most people liked Fantastic Mr. Fox better than I did. So don't let me stop you.